Pablo Navarrete, Caracas: Further to my previous post regarding the US government´s preparations for military conflict with Venezuela, The Washington Post´s William Arkin - the author of the original piece my post referred to - has put up a follow-up piece entitled "Pentagon to Venezuela: Who, Us?", in which he defends his original article.
I think the paragraph below is particularly telling:
"Rumsfeld is equally opportunistic, carrying out his duty and unflinchingly and unapologetically seeing the world in the way that he does: There may be no "plan" for an assassination, coup, sabotage or invasion, and that in itself is a problem to be rectified. The United States military can not and should not be caught with its pants down."
I wonder, had this kind of comment been posted by an Islamic fundamentalist group and been in relation to the US or Britain instead of Venezuela, would the authors have survived US or British ´anti-terror´ legislation?
To see the more recent ´Washington Post´ article press here.
medical newsletter titles
medical news today new york times
medical newsletters uk
medical news papers
http://pills-worldwide.com/products/atacand.htm - medical news today oncology
Posted by: medicine news journals | December 18, 2010 at 01:06 PM