[The Venezuela Information Centre (VIC) respond to a piece in Sunday's 'Observer' by John Carlin entitled "Revealed: Chávez role in cocaine trail to Europe". Click here to see other critical responses to Carlin's piece. To see Carlin's 'Observer' piece click here.]
Responding to The Observer’s Disinformation on Hugo Chavez
By the Venezuela Information Centre (VIC) - 5/2/08
On Sunday 3 February The Observer
devoted a double page spread to a story claiming that President Hugo
Chavez’s government is colluding in the Colombian drugs trade. The
article, titled “Revealed: Chavez role in cocaine trail to Europe”,
was rehashed from an earlier publication in El Pais
on 16 December 2007 and was a blatant piece of negative anti-Chavez
propaganda. It was based on a series of unsubstantiated claims,
distortions and interviews with unidentified sources, in which not a
single allegation was backed up by hard evidence. It clearly forms part
of a renewed, co-ordinated media campaign against Venezuela and it
follows from the recent Channel 4 Dispatches programme (where Martin
Bright said that Hugo Chavez colluded with narco-terrorists) and the
BBC’s Panorama programme (where Alex James reported from Colombia).
It
is difficult to find one single corroborated fact in the article.
Indeed, despite all the claims and spin in the piece, and its headline,
it is forced, even by its own standards, to admit that there is no such
role: `No source I spoke to accused Chávez himself of having a direct
role in Colombia's giant drug-trafficking business.’ However this has
not stopped The Observer from
being the latest to make a clearly political intervention aimed at
furthering the anti-Chavez agenda. This intervention is taking place
amidst a background of Venezuela’s recent successful role in freeing
hostages in Colombia and in promoting a negotiated peace there. The
only possible ‘rationale’ for such a journalistic effort must be to
attempt to reverse and distort the positive effects of Venezuela’s
contribution to this process. Venezuela is continuing to pursue a
policy aimed at assisting the peace process and freeing the remaining
hostages.
This
type of reporting – based on opinion, hearsay and devoid of facts – has
to be challenged, both at the level of the standard of journalism
(particularly in a serious Sunday weekly such as The Observer) and on the bare facts. Carlin’s piece does not qualify as journalism and is simply anti-Chavez propaganda.
We
reproduce separately on our website other articles making these points,
such as Toni Solo’s excellent piece from www.venezuelanalysis.com which
is a particularly effective point by point rebuttal and effectively
demolishes any pretensions to responsible, factual or objective
reporting. The `claims’ contained in The Observer
article have indeed been strongly rejected by the Venezuelan
government. Such attacks alarmingly come against an ever increasing
background of tension in Venezuelan-Colombian relations and US
aggression towards Venezuela, which President Chavez recently raised
strong concerns over. There are fears that the ground is being laid for
some kind of military intervention against Venezuela, with such
fabrications used as a pretext.
Indeed,
John Walters, Director of the US Office of National Drug Control Policy
(ONDCP), during his visit to Colombia in January, asserted that
Venezuela has become `a haven’ for shipments of cocaine manufactured in
Colombia and that Venezuela was refusing to act against the traffic.
The Venezuelan government has rejected these claims, pointing out that
Venezuela's levels of international co-operation with other nations
against drug trafficking have significantly increased. While Venezuela
has been accused of non-compliance in the war on drugs by the US
following its expulsion of US Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) officers 3
years ago, Venezuela continues to meet its obligations within the UN
drug control regime and respects all international counter-narcotics
conventions.
The
Venezuelan government, far from being complicit, has actually increased
its successes in combating the illegal drugs trade, and has won
acknowledgement for this internationally, including from the UN. The
article’s main claims are that there is collusion between the
government of Venezuela and the FARC, yet the only sources quoted to
support this are anonymous, former-FARC members and other unnamed
individuals. No evidence is provided, other than uncorroborated
hearsay. The article aims to throw mud, which it hopes will stick.
However, the facts on Venezuela’s record are clear.
Venezuela’s
government under Hugo Chavez has a clear policy against drug
trafficking. Moreover, the country finds itself in the unenviable
position of being between Colombia -- the world’s largest cocaine
producer (approximately 90 per cent) and the US – the world’s largest
consumer of cocaine.
(click here to view entire article)
surprised?
that's how the so.called civilised operates. lies, bullsh*t and propaganda all in the name of free.dumb,just.us and de.mockery
keep on rocking in the free world
Posted by: al-fallujah | February 08, 2008 at 05:07 AM
the "secret" has been known for years ... who doesn't know that Chavez is one of the biggest drug runners in the world .... he will meet his fate as Noriega did ... first an indictment for drug-dealing and money -laundering , then an invasion and crushing blow to him and his followers by CIA and military
Posted by: CIA | February 08, 2008 at 09:11 PM
Chavez has been protecting narco-terrorists of the FARC an ELN for years. One wonders what he gets in return other that to assert ignorant and even stupid commentaries about his Colombia counterpart. No doubt he's a smart dictator...but eventually the Pueblo Venezolano will get wise and kick him out of office...just a matter of time now that he has lost his latest referendum.
Posted by: Robert | March 03, 2008 at 03:26 AM